• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • Press Room
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • Donate
  • Publications
    • PRRAC Publications & PRRAC Authors
    • PRRAC Policy Briefs
    • PRRAC Advocacy Resources
    • PRRAC Advocacy Letters
  • Events
  • Contact

PRRAC — Connecting Research to Advocacy

Poverty & Race Research Action Council

MENUMENU
  • Fair Housing
    • Fair Housing Homepage
    • Federal Housing Advocacy – by Program
    • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)
    • Housing Mobility (Section 8)
    • Source of Income Discrimination
    • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
    • Fair Housing and Community Development
  • School Diversity
  • Environmental Justice
  • Special Projects
    • Civil Rights History
    • Civil Rights & The Administrative State
    • Expanding the "Social Housing" Sector
    • Housing-School Nexus
    • International Human Rights and U.S. Civil Rights Policy
    • One Nation Indivisible: School Diversity, Immigrant Integration, and Multi-Racial Coalitions
    • PRRAC in the Courts
    • Alliance Housing Justice
  • Search
    • Search

You are here: Home / Browse PRRAC Content / Poverty & Race Journal / “The Policy Possibilities to Confront the Racial Impacts of Gentrification” by Chloe Latham Sikes & Terrance L. Green (Oct – Dec 2021 P&R Issue)

“The Policy Possibilities to Confront the Racial Impacts of Gentrification” by Chloe Latham Sikes & Terrance L. Green (Oct – Dec 2021 P&R Issue)

December 16, 2021 by

By Chloe Latham Sikes & Terrance L. Green (click here for the PDF)

Gentrification is a worldwide phenomenon that is deeply rooted in settler colonialism, anti-Black racism, and capitalism (Green, Sikes, Horne, Germain & Castro, in press). It is often characterized by the influx of new investments in residential housing, business, and commercial real estate that results in the displacement of low-income, Black, Indigenous, Latinx, Asian and Pacific Islander People and the erasure of their culture. Given the historic connection between neighborhoods and local education systems, gentrification can also appear as school gentrification (Posey-Maddox, 2014). 

School gentrification can take different forms when schools are decoupled from their local neighborhood enrollment and demographics. Some experience waves of new investments in resources, teachers, and facilities (Posey-Maddox, 2014). School investments can also slow to a trickle as resources are redirected through intentional disinvestment (Green, Germain, Castro, Sikes, Horne, Sánchez, 2020). A key factor in the trajectory of schools’ gentrification is the increasing disconnection between local school assignments and their surrounding neighborhoods by enabling gentrifying families to reside and invest in the neighborhood without similar investments in the local schools (Green et al., 2020; Pearman & Swain, 2017). 

Changes in investments often correspond with racial and socioeconomic changes in school enrollment. Gentrifying families tend to be White, upper-middle-class newcomers to historically Black and Brown neighborhoods. As school gentrification takes place, schools are caught in the tension between rapid demographic change and remaining reflections of the neighborhoods that had existed previously. This leads to several policy problems and opportunities for intervention.

Our Research 

Policy suggestions arise from a multi-city study of school gentrification. The study builds upon scholarship focused on how city gentrification impacts local schools (Posey-Maddox, 2014), how parental school choice influence school-based programs and resource investments (Posey-Maddox, 2014; Roda, 2020), and how the landscape of school choice decouples schools and housing, which have traditionally been closely knit features of neighborhoods (Pearman & Swain, 2017). 

Our research has identified three major policy problems. Gentrification:

1. Destabilizes Black and Latinx school enrollment by creating a mismatch between local neighborhoods and gentrifying school demographics (i.e., rapid increase of White residents in the neighborhood with a school that traditionally serves Black and/or Latinx families);

2. Compromises Title I funding in schools that experience a rapid influx of more affluent families enrolling; and

3. Undermines Black and Brown students’ social and emotional well-being and mental health through cultural and historical erasure, and displacement from school programs, opportunities, and their familiar neighborhoods.

These problems present real challenges to efforts to promote racial justice in school districts.

Recommendations 

State and local policymakers can:

1. Develop school district-wide racially conscious plans to sustain equitable enrollment, resources, program options, staffing, and school-parent engagement strategies, especially in gentrifying schools that primarily serve historically marginalized students.

2. Commit to supporting affordable housing for Black and other racially minoritized teachers to remain in their districts. This has been achieved through city partnerships with housing authorities and local school districts as a targeted housing strategy.

3. Develop “right to return” and “right to stay” education and housing policies for racially marginalized students and families who are being negatively impacted by gentrification. 

State and local policymakers and leaders can take action to intervene in school gentrification before schools lose their cultures and their communities. ▀

 

Chloe Latham Sikes (chloe.sikes@idra.org) is the Deputy Director of Policy at the Intercultural Development Research Association. 

Terrance L. Green (tgreen@austin.utexas.edu) is an Associate Professor in the College of Education at the University of Texas at Austin.

 

References

Green, T.L., Latham-Sikes, C., Horne, J, Castro, A., Germain, E., & Sanchez, J. (in press). Making waves: Districts’ actions in the flow of School Gentrification. Educational Policy. 

Green, T.L., Germain, E., Castro, A., Sanchez, J., & Latham-Sikes, C., Horne, J. (2020). Changing neighborhoods, changing schools: An emerging typology of school changes in a gentrifying district. Urban Education. 

Pearman, F. A., & Swain, W. A. (2017). School choice, gentrification, and the variable significance of racial stratification in urban neighborhoods. Sociology of Education, 0038040717710494.

Posey-Maddox, L. (2014). When middle-class parents choose urban schools. University of Chicago Press.

Roda, A. (2020). “Holding the Line”: Investigating How Urban School Leaders’ Respond to Gentrification in New York City Schools. Urban Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920959137.

Filed Under: Housing-Schools Nexus Articles (via Poverty & Race), Poverty & Race Journal

You might also like…

“Long Island High School Students Advocate for Housing and School Integration” by Elaine Gross (Oct – Dec 2021 P&R Issue)
Excerpt: “Between the Lines” (Oct – Dec 2021 P&R Issue)

Primary Sidebar

PRRAC Updates

PRRAC Update (June 2, 2022): School Diversity Funding Campaign; PHAs and School Districts

PRRAC Update (May 19, 2022): AFFH and the President’s Housing Supply Plan; Opening Up Selective High Schools

PRRAC Update (April 21, 2022): Proposed Charter School Priorities; HUD’s Racial Equity Plan

Previous Updates...

PRRAC in the News

Why the Latest Fight About Charter Rules Matters — for Schools and Education Politics (Chalkbeat)

May 9, 2022

Democrats Have No Plan to Fight Housing Inflation (Vox)

November 11, 2021

‘We Don’t Take That:’ Why Illegal Discrimination Toward Section 8 Tenants Goes Unchecked in NJ (Asbury Park Press)

October 26, 2021

Undoing Structural Racism: The Need for Systemic Change in Housing Policy (Nonprofit Quarterly)

August 4, 2021

Previous Posts...

PRRAC on Twitter

Tweets by @PRRAC_DC

Poverty & Race Journal

Footer

PRRAC – Poverty & Race Research Action Council

The Poverty & Race Research Action Council (PRRAC) is a civil rights law and policy organization based in Washington, D.C. Our mission is to promote research-based advocacy strategies to address structural inequality and disrupt the systems that disadvantage low-income people of color. PRRAC was founded in 1989, through an initiative of major civil rights, civil liberties, and anti-poverty groups seeking to connect advocates with social scientists working at the intersection of race and poverty…Read More

Archives

Resources at PRRAC

  • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fair Housing
  • Fair Housing & Community Development
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • PRRAC Update
  • School Diversity
  • Housing Choice Voucher Mobility
  • PRRAC in The Courts

Copyright © 2022 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in var _ctct_m = "7608c7e98e90af7d6ba8b5fd4d901424"; //static.ctctcdn.com/js/signup-form-widget/current/signup-form-widget.min.js

PRRAC — Connecting Research to Advocacy

  • Fair Housing
    • Fair Housing Homepage
    • Federal Housing Advocacy – by Program
    • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)
    • Housing Mobility (Section 8)
    • Source of Income Discrimination
    • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
    • Fair Housing and Community Development
  • School Diversity
  • Environmental Justice
  • Special Projects
    • Civil Rights History
    • Civil Rights & The Administrative State
    • Expanding the “Social Housing” Sector
    • Housing-School Nexus
    • International Human Rights and U.S. Civil Rights Policy
    • One Nation Indivisible: School Diversity, Immigrant Integration, and Multi-Racial Coalitions
    • PRRAC in the Courts
    • Alliance Housing Justice
  • Search
  • About
  • Press Room
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • Donate
  • Publications
    • PRRAC Publications & PRRAC Authors
    • PRRAC Policy Briefs
    • PRRAC Advocacy Resources
    • PRRAC Advocacy Letters
  • Events
  • Contact