• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • Press Room
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • Donate
  • Publications
    • PRRAC Publications & PRRAC Authors
    • PRRAC Policy Briefs
    • PRRAC Advocacy Resources
    • PRRAC Advocacy Letters
  • Events
  • Contact

PRRAC — Connecting Research to Advocacy

Poverty & Race Research Action Council

MENUMENU
  • Fair Housing
    • Fair Housing Homepage
    • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)
    • Housing Mobility & the Housing Choice Voucher Program
    • Source of Income Discrimination
    • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
    • Fair Housing and Community Development
    • Civil Rights and Housing Finance Reform
    • Federal Housing Advocacy – Other Programs
  • Social Housing
  • School Diversity
    • School Diversity
    • National Coalition on School Diversity Website
  • Housing-Schools Intersections
  • Special Projects
    • Civil Rights History
    • Civil Rights & The Administrative State
    • Environmental Justice
    • International Human Rights and U.S. Civil Rights Policy
    • PRRAC In the Courts
    • Title VI Repository
  • Search
    • Search

You are here: Home / Poverty & Race Journal / “Should Racial Integration Be Pursued As the Only Goal?” by Joe Feagin and Yvonne Combs (January-February 2000 P&R Issue)

“Should Racial Integration Be Pursued As the Only Goal?” by Joe Feagin and Yvonne Combs (January-February 2000 P&R Issue)

February 1, 2000 by

By Joe Feagin and Yvonne Combs (Click here to view the entire P&R issue)

In practice, racial desegregation has often become a game of numbers, a game that does not serve well the basic needs and interests of the black community. Clearly, the end of legal segregation has meant some increased housing, job, and education options for black Americans, especially those in the middle class. There has been some societal desegregation in many areas.

Yet, a token number of blacks in formerly all-white neighborhoods, schools, and workplaces have signaled to many whites that conditions for blacks are now the same as for whites, if not better.

However, what the omnipresent numbers on desegregation fail to show is the quality of this social change in everyday life. Many black Americans have not benefited much from racial desegregation.

They got some increased opportunities here and there, but they remain informally segregated and racially targeted across most institutions in the society. Moreover, the quality of life for blacks in desegregated institutions is often negative and filled with racist obstacles. So-called integrated institutions have mostly incorporated blacks and other people of color in limited numbers without changing their white-washed character and culture; most are still run by white men according to the rules and norms long ago established in the white interest. Much research shows that today a majority of whites are still quite racist in their thinking about black Americans and that a majority will still sometimes discriminate — in areas like housing or promotions — when given the chance. Today, the white majority still gives the ideal of racial equality only lip-service.

Given the failure to achieve large-scale integration and continuing white racism in all major institutions, many black Americans have shown a growing interest in community control and self-development strategies. In the mid-1990s, New York Times reporter Isabel Wilkerson interviewed several dozen middle-class blacks in LA and found them angry over police brutality and other racism issues. As a result, many were becoming more committed to black businesses and greater black community solidarity and separation from whites. In his important book, Integration or Separation?, leading black legal scholar Roy Brooks — formerly a dedicated integrationist — shows the defects in the integration strategy. As he sees it now, black Americans should keep integration as a strategy but couple it with strong community-focused strategies necessary for their short-term and long-term well-being. Working in the tradition of Malcolm X and W. E. B. DuBois, numerous scholars and community leaders have reiterated the importance of African values and understandings for African Americans in building stronger communities and community control strategies.

In short, it is possible today to have safe neighborhoods, healthy homes, good economic activity and successful school experiences within predominately black communities. Mere proximity to whites does not ensure socioeconomic security or advancement. It is possible for African Americans to develop greater community control and a more independent infrastructure.

Consider, for example, the little-known story of the prosperous “Black Wall Street” of Tulsa, Oklahoma, in the early 20th century. Destroyed by white rioting and arson in 1921 [see “Unearthing a Riot” by Brent Staples, in the Dec. 19, 1999 N.Y. Times Magazine], this center of black prosperity is a possible prototype for greater economic independence. The money made in the community there, and in many other cities at that time, tended to stay in those communities.

As John S. Butler has made clear in his research, that so many strong black communities existed on the heels of slavery clearly points to the ability of blacks to set their own agenda outside the confines of white society. A vicious war against these communities in the 1920s and 1930s — by whites at all class levels — and the impact of the Great Depression wiped out much of this black-controlled prosperity.

Some improvement in material circumstances for many black Americans, coupled with official desegregation of schools and neighborhoods, has failed to close the gap between black and white living standards. Indeed, in many ways, the socioeconomic gap now seems to be widening. And racial discrimination remains widespread.

In the long run, hopefully, the strategy of thorough-going racial desegregation and integration may still make sense for African Americans and for the larger society. However, it is an ideal still rejected in practice by most whites, who have the greatest power to implement it. In the meantime, one clear recommendation of a growing number of black voices is for black Americans to embrace the opportunity to develop greater solidarity and community control within black communities.

Joe Feagin (feagin@ufl.edu) is Research Prof. of Sociology, Yvonne Combs (yjcombs@ufl.edu) a doctoral student in sociology, at the Univ. of Florida, Gainesville. Feagin is President (1999-2000) of the Amer. Sociological Assn.

Filed Under: Poverty & Race Journal, Symposium Responses Tagged With: all white neighborhoods, good economic activity, healthy homes, racial integration, safe neighborhoods, segregation, Should Racial Integration Be Pursued As the Only Goal?, successful school experiences

You might also like…

“Is Integration Possible? Of Course…” by Florence Wagman Roisman (January-February 2000 P&R Issue)
“Education and Incentives to Actualize Integration” by Don DeMarco (January-February P&R Issue)

Primary Sidebar

PRRAC Updates

PRRAC Update: New issue of Poverty & Race; SSAB transitions; holiday gift guide (November 25, 2025)

PRRAC Update (November 13, 2025): Proposed CFPB rule; rural social housing; government re-opening

PRRAC Update (October 30, 2025): Federal civil service decimation; new PRRAC & NHLP publications

Previous Updates...

PRRAC in the News

Discrimination cases unravel as Trump scraps core civil rights tenet

June 1, 2025

Trump Just Issued an Executive Order Aimed at Decimating the Civil Rights Act of 1964

May 4, 2025

Ballot measure seeks to end discrimination based on source of rental income in Lincoln, Nebraska

April 16, 2025

What Trump’s DEI Orders Could Mean for Housing

February 21, 2025

Previous Posts...

Poverty & Race Journal

Footer

PRRAC – Poverty & Race Research Action Council

The Poverty & Race Research Action Council (PRRAC) is a civil rights law and policy organization based in Washington, D.C. Our mission is to promote research-based advocacy strategies to address structural inequality and disrupt the systems that disadvantage low-income people of color. PRRAC was founded in 1989, through an initiative of major civil rights, civil liberties, and anti-poverty groups seeking to connect advocates with social scientists working at the intersection of race and poverty…Read More

Archives

Resources at PRRAC

  • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fair Housing
  • Fair Housing & Community Development
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • PRRAC Update
  • School Diversity
  • Housing Choice Voucher Mobility
  • PRRAC in The Courts

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in var _ctct_m = "7608c7e98e90af7d6ba8b5fd4d901424"; //static.ctctcdn.com/js/signup-form-widget/current/signup-form-widget.min.js

PRRAC — Connecting Research to AdvocacyLogo Header Menu

  • Fair Housing
    • Fair Housing Homepage
    • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)
    • Housing Mobility & the Housing Choice Voucher Program
    • Source of Income Discrimination
    • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
    • Fair Housing and Community Development
    • Civil Rights and Housing Finance Reform
    • Federal Housing Advocacy – Other Programs
  • Social Housing
  • School Diversity
    • School Diversity
    • National Coalition on School Diversity Website
  • Housing-Schools Intersections
  • Special Projects
    • Civil Rights History
    • Civil Rights & The Administrative State
    • Environmental Justice
    • International Human Rights and U.S. Civil Rights Policy
    • PRRAC In the Courts
    • Title VI Repository
  • Search
  • About
  • Press Room
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • Donate
  • Publications
    • PRRAC Publications & PRRAC Authors
    • PRRAC Policy Briefs
    • PRRAC Advocacy Resources
    • PRRAC Advocacy Letters
  • Events
  • Contact