• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • Press Room
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • Donate
  • Publications
    • PRRAC Publications & PRRAC Authors
    • PRRAC Policy Briefs
    • PRRAC Advocacy Resources
    • PRRAC Advocacy Letters
  • Events
  • Contact

PRRAC — Connecting Research to Advocacy

Poverty & Race Research Action Council

MENUMENU
  • Fair Housing
    • Fair Housing Homepage
    • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)
    • Housing Mobility & the Housing Choice Voucher Program
    • Source of Income Discrimination
    • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
    • Fair Housing and Community Development
    • Civil Rights and Housing Finance Reform
    • Federal Housing Advocacy – Other Programs
  • Social Housing
  • School Diversity
    • School Diversity
    • National Coalition on School Diversity Website
  • Housing-Schools Intersections
  • Special Projects
    • Civil Rights History
    • Civil Rights & The Administrative State
    • Environmental Justice
    • International Human Rights and U.S. Civil Rights Policy
    • PRRAC In the Courts
    • Title VI Repository
  • Search
    • Search

You are here: Home / Advocacy Guides / Public or Community Control of Rental Housing Policy Brief No. 2: Using Eminent Domain to Acquire Private Rental Housing – Recent Examples (PRRAC, October 2020)

Public or Community Control of Rental Housing Policy Brief No. 2: Using Eminent Domain to Acquire Private Rental Housing – Recent Examples (PRRAC, October 2020)

October 23, 2020 by

The King County Housing Authority (KCHA) in Washington State has used eminent domain as part of its affordable housing strategy. Under Washington State law, public housing authorities are authorized to use eminent domain to acquire housing projects within their area of operation.[1] KCHA has used the threat of eminent domain to encourage owners to sell affordable multifamily rental properties to the housing authority.[2] In 2019, the agency followed through on the threat to acquire property through eminent domain. KCHA’s Board of Commissioners passed resolutions approving the use of eminent domain to acquire multifamily properties if the housing authority was unsuccessful in negotiating their purchase.[3] The multifamily properties targeted for acquisition were considered to be at high risk of losing affordability, which would result in displacement of residents.[4] In September of 2019, KCHA used eminent domain to acquire 5 properties for $245 million.[5] These included two Fannie Mae backed multifamily properties.[6]

Gil Cedillo, a member of the Los Angeles City Council, has proposed the use of eminent domain to protect tenants at a complex where affordability restrictions will expire and rents will be raised to market-rate levels. On March 27, the City Council voted to instruct the City Attorney and the Los Angeles Housing and Community Investment Department to issue a report within 30 days on the use of eminent domain.[7]

Eminent domain can also be used to acquire intangible property.[8] The novel idea of using eminent domain to address foreclosures emerged in the early 2010s as a way to address the foreclosure crisis.[9] Several communities around the country such as Richmond, California seriously explored the feasibility of using eminent domain to seize underwater mortgages, restructure loans to reduce the principal, and then resell the debt to a private buyer.[10] While the idea generated much debate and scholarly discussion[11], it also created strong backlash from those who owned the mortgages and challenged its constitutionality under the Takings Clause.[12] Congress ultimately passed legislation making it illegal for the federal government to back mortgages seized through eminent domain, effectively ending any possibility of implementation.[13]

(updated April 13, 2020)

[1] Wash. Rev. Code §35.82.070 https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=35.82.070

[2] Jared Brey, Activists Urge Los Angeles to Use Eminent Domain to Save City’s Affordable Housing, Next City (Feb. 11, 2020), available at https://nextcity.org/daily/entry/activists-urge-los-angeles-use-eminent-domain-save-affordable-housing

[3] The Housing Authority of the County of King, Resolution No. 5625, A Resolution Authorizing Acquisition of Emerson Apartments (June 4, 2019), https://www.kcha.org/Portals/0/PDF/Board/201906%20KCHA%20Board%20Packet.pdfl; The Housing Authority of the County of King, Resolution No. 5622, A Resolution Authorizing Acquisition of Kendall Ridge Apartments (Mar. 25, 2019), https://www.kcha.org/Portals/0/PDF/Board/201905%20KCHA%20BOARD%20PACKET%20A.pdf

[4] Id.

[5] Housing Action Affects Agency Bonds, (Jan. 17, 2020), https://www.cmalert.com/search.pl?ARTICLE=187772

[6] Fannie Mae, Multifamily Properties Purchased Through Eminent Domain, https://www.fanniemae.com/portal/funding-the-market/mbs/news/2019/multifamily-properties-eminent-domain-100919.html

[7]https://cityclerk.lacity.org/lacityclerkconnect/index.cfm?fa=ccfi.viewrecord&cfnumber=20-0148

[8] Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Radford, 295 U.S. 555, 596 (1935)

[9] See Robert Hockett, “We Don’t Follow, We Lead”: How New York City Will Save Mortgage Loans by Condemning Them, The Yale Law Journal Forum (Nov. 29, 2014), available at https://www.yalelawjournal.org/pdf/HockettPDF_moakg6ig.pdf

[10] Sarah Thompson, Eminent Domain for the Seizure of Underwater Mortgages, 47 U. Mich. J. L. Reform 22-23 (2013), available at https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1015&context=mjlr_caveat

[11] See Ngai Pindell, Nevada’s Residential Real Estate Crisis: Local Governments and the Use of Eminent Domain to Condemn Mortgage Notes, 13 Nev. L. Rev. 888 (2013), available at https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1487&context=nlj

[12] Robert Rogers, Banks Sue Richmond to Halt Plan to Seize Mortgages, San Jose Mercury News, Aug. 8, 2013, https://www.mercurynews.com/2013/08/08/banks-sue-richmond-to-halt-plan-to-seize-mortgages/

[13] https://www.consumerfinancialserviceswatch.com/2014/12/eminent-enabler-congress-prohibits-hud-and-ginnie-mae-from-facilitating-local-government-seizure-of-mortgage-loans/

Filed Under: Advocacy Guides, Fair Housing & Community Development, Housing Mobility & Health Policy Briefs, Policy Briefs, Publications, Social Housing Publications

You might also like…

What Can HUD Do to Expand Public and Community Ownership of Rental Housing? (PRRAC, April 2021)
Public or Community Control of Rental Housing Policy Brief No. 3: Community Land Trusts and Other Public Ownership Vehicles (PRRAC, October 2020)

Primary Sidebar

PRRAC Updates

PRRAC Update (July 10, 2025): Housing justice victories + join us at the 10th National Conference on Housing Mobility!

PRRAC Update (June 26, 2025): Legal action against HUD & addressing affordable housing costs

PRRAC Update (June 12, 2025): Understanding the latest threats to housing access

Previous Updates...

PRRAC in the News

Discrimination cases unravel as Trump scraps core civil rights tenet

June 1, 2025

Trump Just Issued an Executive Order Aimed at Decimating the Civil Rights Act of 1964

May 4, 2025

Ballot measure seeks to end discrimination based on source of rental income in Lincoln, Nebraska

April 16, 2025

What Trump’s DEI Orders Could Mean for Housing

February 21, 2025

Previous Posts...

Poverty & Race Journal

Footer

PRRAC – Poverty & Race Research Action Council

The Poverty & Race Research Action Council (PRRAC) is a civil rights law and policy organization based in Washington, D.C. Our mission is to promote research-based advocacy strategies to address structural inequality and disrupt the systems that disadvantage low-income people of color. PRRAC was founded in 1989, through an initiative of major civil rights, civil liberties, and anti-poverty groups seeking to connect advocates with social scientists working at the intersection of race and poverty…Read More

Archives

Resources at PRRAC

  • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fair Housing
  • Fair Housing & Community Development
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • PRRAC Update
  • School Diversity
  • Housing Choice Voucher Mobility
  • PRRAC in The Courts

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in var _ctct_m = "7608c7e98e90af7d6ba8b5fd4d901424"; //static.ctctcdn.com/js/signup-form-widget/current/signup-form-widget.min.js

PRRAC — Connecting Research to AdvocacyLogo Header Menu

  • Fair Housing
    • Fair Housing Homepage
    • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)
    • Housing Mobility & the Housing Choice Voucher Program
    • Source of Income Discrimination
    • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
    • Fair Housing and Community Development
    • Civil Rights and Housing Finance Reform
    • Federal Housing Advocacy – Other Programs
  • Social Housing
  • School Diversity
    • School Diversity
    • National Coalition on School Diversity Website
  • Housing-Schools Intersections
  • Special Projects
    • Civil Rights History
    • Civil Rights & The Administrative State
    • Environmental Justice
    • International Human Rights and U.S. Civil Rights Policy
    • PRRAC In the Courts
    • Title VI Repository
  • Search
  • About
  • Press Room
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • Donate
  • Publications
    • PRRAC Publications & PRRAC Authors
    • PRRAC Policy Briefs
    • PRRAC Advocacy Resources
    • PRRAC Advocacy Letters
  • Events
  • Contact
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.