• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • Press Room
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • Donate
  • Publications
    • PRRAC Publications & PRRAC Authors
    • PRRAC Policy Briefs
    • PRRAC Advocacy Resources
    • PRRAC Advocacy Letters
  • Events
  • Contact

PRRAC — Connecting Research to Advocacy

Poverty & Race Research Action Council

MENUMENU
  • Fair Housing
    • Fair Housing Homepage
    • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)
    • Housing Mobility & the Housing Choice Voucher Program
    • Source of Income Discrimination
    • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
    • Fair Housing and Community Development
    • Civil Rights and Housing Finance Reform
    • Federal Housing Advocacy – Other Programs
  • Social Housing
  • School Diversity
    • School Diversity
    • National Coalition on School Diversity Website
  • Housing-Schools Intersections
  • Special Projects
    • Civil Rights History
    • Civil Rights & The Administrative State
    • Environmental Justice
    • International Human Rights and U.S. Civil Rights Policy
    • PRRAC In the Courts
    • Title VI Repository
  • Search
    • Search

You are here: Home / Advocacy Documents / Transportation Equity and Regional Housing Planning / DOT Proposed Rule on Statewide Metropolitan Transportation Planning (PRRAC, October 2014)

DOT Proposed Rule on Statewide Metropolitan Transportation Planning (PRRAC, October 2014)

October 2, 2014 by

Link to pdf fileOctober 2, 2014

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations
M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE
Washington, DC 20590

RE: Docket No. FHWA-2013 – 0037; FHWA RIN 2125 – AF52; FTA RIN 2132– AB10, Proposed Rule on Statewide and Nonmetropolitan Transportation Planning and Metropolitan Transportation Planning

To Whom It May Concern: Civil rights practitioners have long advocated for transparent, outcome-driven policies in federally-supported programs, including transit programs. A performance-based approach grounded in clear, meaningful standards is central to ensuring that our federal resources are well leveraged to promote economic and other opportunities for all.

We are pleased that the FTA’s proposed rulemaking on transportation programs takes important steps in this direction. We strongly support the FTA’s implementation of MAP-21’s performance management framework as a method of steering transportation investments toward concrete policy goals as defined by clear performance measures. In particular, the following general elements of the proposed rule will be crucial in ensuring equitable, effective use of federal transit resources in the future: the draft rule’s robust focus on the collection, coordination, and use of data; its related reporting requirements; and its emphasis on coordination and cooperation among responsible parties (including states, MPOs, and transit providers).

While we welcome these changes to the planning process, substantive aspects of the proposed rule have severe shortcomings. The draft regulation fails to adequately implement key civil rights legal obligations that attach to federal programs, or to promote the important policy goal of equitably serving all communities. In particular, the draft rule is missing both guidance that reflects environmental justice obligations and guidance that implements the Fair Housing Act’s obligation that all agencies and recipients of community development funds affirmatively further fair housing (“AFFH”), 42 U.S.C. §3608, including the promotion of residential choice and integration.

We recommend that U.S. DOT make several concrete changes to the proposed rule in order to meet these important obligations and serve all communities, in particular the low-income and minority communities that are frequently highly transit-reliant. Our specific recommendations are as follows:

 Explicitly incorporate U.S. DOT’s environmental justice strategy into the planning process. Planning entities must comply fully with existing Title VI and environmental justice requirements (including those included in the relevant FTA Circulars) for evaluation of the impact of significant decisions and actions on environmental justice populations. However, a more concrete and comprehensive framework specific to the planning process should be developed (and should correct for current shortfalls in the existing applicable guidance, as in the scoping process and the evaluation of cumulative burdens or inequitable benefits). This EJ evaluative framework should stand as an explicit, concrete element of the planning process and should be reflected in the certification requirements.

 Disaggregation of data. As noted, we welcome the draft regulation’s emphasis on the use of data to shape transit policy. However, we urge U.S. DOT to require the analysis of disaggregated data that indicates race and income. Such disaggregation is fundamental to transparency in transit and related planning; without clear analyses of which communities are being served and how, it will be impossible for agencies, recipients, or the public to evaluate compliance with civil rights mandates or sound public policy ensuring the equitable use of federal funds.

 The obligation to affirmatively further fair housing extends to all federal agencies and recipients in the administration of housing or development programs, including those of U.S. DOT. AFFH requires that such programs not only refrain from discrimination, but actively promote fair housing choice and residential integration. The draft guidance fails to reflect this obligation. We recommend that all transportation planning include an evaluation of programmatic impacts on segregation and other aspects of AFFH and the designation of clear, performance-driven goals that actively further fair housing. Guidance should also make explicit that transportation planning must be coordinated with that of federal funding streams as relevant to AFFH, including those of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The setting of AFFH goals should be required, with progress toward those goals to be strongly incentivized throughout the planning process.

Thank you for the opportunity to submit our recommendations on this important rule. We hope that U.S.DOT will take the targeted steps that we describe above, and ensure that MAP-21 achieves its full potential to promote opportunity across all communities.

Best regards,

Megan Haberle
Poverty & Race Research Action Council
Washington, DC
Email: mhaberle@prrac.org/Phone: 718-614-9804

Filed Under: Transportation Equity and Regional Housing Planning, Advocacy Letters, Environmental Justice, Environmental Justice Advocacy Letters, Transportation Equity and Regional Housing Planning Advocacy Letters

You might also like…

What You Need to Know about the Trump Administration’s Attack on Affirmative Marketing (June 2025)
PRRAC comments on proposed Community Reinvestment Act regulations, August 2022

Primary Sidebar

PRRAC Updates

PRRAC Update (June 12, 2025): Understanding the latest threats to housing access

PRRAC Update (May 29, 2025): LIHTC in the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act”

PRRAC Update (May 15, 2025) Join us for the 10th National Conference on Housing Mobility!

Previous Updates...

PRRAC in the News

Discrimination cases unravel as Trump scraps core civil rights tenet

June 1, 2025

Trump Just Issued an Executive Order Aimed at Decimating the Civil Rights Act of 1964

May 4, 2025

Ballot measure seeks to end discrimination based on source of rental income in Lincoln, Nebraska

April 16, 2025

What Trump’s DEI Orders Could Mean for Housing

February 21, 2025

Previous Posts...

Poverty & Race Journal

Footer

PRRAC – Poverty & Race Research Action Council

The Poverty & Race Research Action Council (PRRAC) is a civil rights law and policy organization based in Washington, D.C. Our mission is to promote research-based advocacy strategies to address structural inequality and disrupt the systems that disadvantage low-income people of color. PRRAC was founded in 1989, through an initiative of major civil rights, civil liberties, and anti-poverty groups seeking to connect advocates with social scientists working at the intersection of race and poverty…Read More

Archives

Resources at PRRAC

  • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
  • Environmental Justice
  • Fair Housing
  • Fair Housing & Community Development
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • PRRAC Update
  • School Diversity
  • Housing Choice Voucher Mobility
  • PRRAC in The Courts

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in var _ctct_m = "7608c7e98e90af7d6ba8b5fd4d901424"; //static.ctctcdn.com/js/signup-form-widget/current/signup-form-widget.min.js

PRRAC — Connecting Research to AdvocacyLogo Header Menu

  • Fair Housing
    • Fair Housing Homepage
    • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)
    • Housing Mobility & the Housing Choice Voucher Program
    • Source of Income Discrimination
    • Low Income Housing Tax Credit
    • Fair Housing and Community Development
    • Civil Rights and Housing Finance Reform
    • Federal Housing Advocacy – Other Programs
  • Social Housing
  • School Diversity
    • School Diversity
    • National Coalition on School Diversity Website
  • Housing-Schools Intersections
  • Special Projects
    • Civil Rights History
    • Civil Rights & The Administrative State
    • Environmental Justice
    • International Human Rights and U.S. Civil Rights Policy
    • PRRAC In the Courts
    • Title VI Repository
  • Search
  • About
  • Press Room
  • Poverty & Race Journal
  • Donate
  • Publications
    • PRRAC Publications & PRRAC Authors
    • PRRAC Policy Briefs
    • PRRAC Advocacy Resources
    • PRRAC Advocacy Letters
  • Events
  • Contact
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.