PRRAC Poverty & Race Research Action Council
Home About PRRAC Current Projects Publications Newsletters Resources Contact Us Support PRRAC Join Our Email List

"Four New Studies on Race and Poverty Trends"

September/October 2011 issue of Poverty & Race

In the past few weeks, a number of important new studies on racialized poverty and inequality have been released, using a five-year data “snapshot” from the American Community Survey. Taken together, these studies illustrate the persistent disproportionate racial impact of poverty in America, rising numbers of African-American and Latino families living in high-poverty neighborhoods, and alarming increases in overall poverty and wealth inequality. These studies also help to provide context for disturbing new poverty data, released in mid-September, that show increasing rates of poverty for African Americans and Latinos (27% and 26%, respectively), and an overall poverty rate (15.1%) at its highest level since 1993.We provide some highlights from four of these reports in the brief summaries below:

Rolf Pendall, Elizabeth Davies, Lesley Freiman & Rob Pitingolo, A Lost Decade: Neighborhood Poverty and the Urban Crisis of the 2000s (The Urban Institute, for the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, September 2011), available at www.jointcenter.org/institutes/health-policy:

  • The number of people in high-poverty neighborhoods increased by nearly 5 million since 2000, when 18.4 million metropolitan residents (7.9% of the total) lived in high-poverty neighborhoods. This rise since 2000 is a significant setback compared with progress in the 1990s.
  • African Americans, Hispanics and American Indians continue to be substantially more likely to live in high-poverty neighborhoods than white non-Hispanics, and people who live below the poverty line—especially minorities in poverty—are at special risk of living in high-poverty neighborhoods.
  • The report also includes interesting insights on the variations in concentrated poverty trends across different metro areas, the increasing racial/ethnic heterogeneity of many high-poverty neighborhoods, and an analysis of the racial and economic trajectories since 1970 of the original “ghetto” neighborhoods identified in the 1968 Kerner Commission report.


Pew Research Center, Twenty-to-One: Wealth Gaps Rise to Record Highs Between Whites, Blacks and Hispanics (July 2011), available at http://pewsocialtrends.org/:

  • In the wake of the foreclosure crisis, the median wealth of white households is now 20 times that of black households and 18 times that of Hispanic households.
  • This wealth gap between whites and minorities is at a historic high, largely because of the slide in housing prices. From 2005 to 2009, inflation-adjusted median wealth fell by 66% among Hispanic households and 53% among black households, compared with just 16% among white households.
  • Hispanics were hit hardest by the meltdown in the housing market. From 2005 to 2009, the median level of home equity held by Hispanic homeowners declined by half—from $99,983 to $49,145—while the homeownership rate among Hispanics was also falling, from 51% to 47%.


John R. Logan, Separate and Unequal: The Neighborhood Gap for Blacks, Hispanics and Asians in Metropolitan America (Brown University, July 2011) available at www.s4.brown.edu/us2010/

  • This study finds that African Americans and Latino families live in substantially poorer neighborhoods than white families, notwithstanding family income levels.
  • Overall, Black and Hispanic households live in neighborhoods with more than one-and-a-half times the poverty rate of neighborhoods where the average non-Hispanic white lives.
  • The average black or Hispanic household earning more than $75,000 still lives in a less affluent, resource-rich neighborhood than a white household that earns less than $40,000.
  • Even Asians, who have higher incomes than blacks and Hispanics and are less residentially segregated, live in somewhat poorer neighborhoods than whites.
  • Racial segregation itself is the prime predictor of which metropolitan regions are the ones where minorities live in the poorest and least desirable neighborhoods.


Nancy McArdle, Theresa Osypuk, Erin Hardy & Dolores Acevedo-García, Child Segregation Issue Brief (Diversity Data Project, July 2011) available at http://diversitydata. sph.harvard.edu

  • This study’s authors found that segregation levels remain high for black and moderate for Latino children living in the 100 largest metropolitan areas, although residential segregation declined moderately between 2000 and 2010.
  • Black segregation fell substantially in large, highly segregated Midwestern metros, such as Detroit, Chicago, Minneapolis and Kansas City, and in smaller metros in Florida and the West.
  • While blacks faced higher segregation rates, black segregation fell in the great majority (83) of the 100 largest metro areas; whereas, Latino segregation fell in only 52 metro areas.
  • Increasing segregation of Latino children in many of the small to medium-sized metros in the South and Midwest, which are experiencing some of the fastest Latino growth, bears careful attention.

[13248]

 
Join Our Email List
Search for:             
Join Our Email List